Dating heavy smoker datingsite voor mensen met autisme
The advertisers defend this reflection on interesting grounds.They say that their studies over many decades have shown a deep-seated public guilt about smoking, which has nothing to do with medical findings and everything to do with an old Puritan tradition, and which can best be allayed by a bedside manner, carefully sustained through what is already known to the trade as "anxiety advertising."Donation for Research The way to restore their phlegm and their prestige might be obvious to an Englishman: to combine in a huge donation for cancer research. Whenever two manufacturers of the same product think to strengthen their case by joining forces the shadow of the Sherman Act falls across their best intentions.He is even sour about the claims of the filter-tipped cigarettes, remarking in his wry way that the carbon in tobacco smoke probably neutralises some toxic agents, and that if the filter removes those carbon particles "filter cigarettes would do more harm than good."Dr Hammond is an ominous figure in this whole controversy because he happens to be conducting, on behalf of the American Cancer Society, the most exhaustive study yet attempted.He began in January 1952, composing a staff of interviewers who will study the life histories of 204,000 healthy white men between the ages of 50 and 69, who together form a statistical sample of the American white male population.
It sprouted the joke that "It only goes to show: mice shouldn't smoke." But the newspapers sat up and took notice, in their heartless disinterested way, when the Institute of Industrial Medicine of this city, an incomparable branch of the New York-Bellevue Medical Center, examined all the tumours reported in the Wynder-Graham study and declared them to be malignant.This ambition is evidently so beset with chemical and biological problems that it has taken almost a year to build and set up the necessary equipment.Standing apart from all the interested parties who would seek to prejudice the truth by arraying the doctors against the manufacturers, there is one odd and important figure, a man possessed of a Voltairean disdain.The tobacco companies paid only sidelong heed to them, with bold hints that, on the contrary, a cigarette was a relaxant, a soothing syrup, and a social grace.
The manufacturers were not much better than the Puritans in their respect for the known scientific facts about tobacco and have tended to meet every impromptu accusation with an equally flip defence.
Meanwhile the medical profession is going ahead on its own.